<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Nutrition Facts via Text Message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/get-nutrition-facts-via-text-message/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/get-nutrition-facts-via-text-message</link>
	<description>Mobile websites, applications, and tools for the mobile phone, PDA, and other wireless devices.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MobileFreak</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/get-nutrition-facts-via-text-message#comment-7818</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/get-nutrition-facts-via-text-message#comment-7818</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Blake. I noticed the Sonic numbers were different, but whom to believe? Should we trust the numbers from the restaurants themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Blake. I noticed the Sonic numbers were different, but whom to believe? Should we trust the numbers from the restaurants themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/get-nutrition-facts-via-text-message#comment-7817</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/get-nutrition-facts-via-text-message#comment-7817</guid>
		<description>Way off. According to Sonic's site the wrap is actually:
Calories: 380
Fat: 11
Carbs: 44
Protein:28

It has ranch which gives it more calories and fat than the Sandwich - but not nearly 4 times as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way off. According to Sonic&#8217;s site the wrap is actually:<br />
Calories: 380<br />
Fat: 11<br />
Carbs: 44<br />
Protein:28</p>
<p>It has ranch which gives it more calories and fat than the Sandwich - but not nearly 4 times as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.167 seconds -->
