<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Website or iPhone App?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/</link>
	<description>Mobile websites, apps, and tools for the mobile phone, PDA, and other wireless devices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 04:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-644</guid>
		<description>I figured I would share my site with you as well... m.ragtube.com which is not an app but a mobile site... Oh mobile Ragtube is an Indie Music Site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured I would share my site with you as well&#8230; m.ragtube.com which is not an app but a mobile site&#8230; Oh mobile Ragtube is an Indie Music Site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-643</guid>
		<description>I think web apps are the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think web apps are the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Dexter</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Working on a couple &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yfdkngx&quot; title=&quot;visual aids to articulate difference b/t iPhone apps and iPhone mobile sites&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;visual aids to articulate difference b/t iPhone apps and iPhone mobile sites&lt;/a&gt; (two pages)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working on a couple <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfdkngx" title="visual aids to articulate difference b/t iPhone apps and iPhone mobile sites" rel="nofollow">visual aids to articulate difference b/t iPhone apps and iPhone mobile sites</a> (two pages)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Kotonya</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Kotonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-641</guid>
		<description>The cost and time of developing for all mobile platforms is prohibitive, and usually not worth the device-specific benefits harvested by the applications.
All mobile devices come with standard web browsers, and for most applications, it makes perfect sense to develop mobile websites.

With GPRS and mobile wi-fi connectivity becoming cheaper, more available and mobile connectivity latency becoming bearable, the mobile apps market will collapse, and give way to operator/ISP-billed pay-per-use mobile websites.
The mobile-app market will quickly be relegated to specialized apps such as high-security databases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost and time of developing for all mobile platforms is prohibitive, and usually not worth the device-specific benefits harvested by the applications.<br />
All mobile devices come with standard web browsers, and for most applications, it makes perfect sense to develop mobile websites.</p>
<p>With GPRS and mobile wi-fi connectivity becoming cheaper, more available and mobile connectivity latency becoming bearable, the mobile apps market will collapse, and give way to operator/ISP-billed pay-per-use mobile websites.<br />
The mobile-app market will quickly be relegated to specialized apps such as high-security databases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileFreak</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Well said Paul, and thanks for contributing. As Salvador also implies, just because being an &#039;iPhone app&#039; is trendy, does not make it so. It&#039;s true that mobile developers can include the large majority of the functionality we see today simply through a mobile website that is available on virtually any mobile browser.

Some handset makers (Apple) and mobile platform providers (Google&#039;s Android) though have pushed the envelope in adding newer functionality that uses information from the device OS itself. The perfect example is the accelerometer, which is available for both iPhone and Android application developers. These &#039;hard-wired&#039; features not available to web developers are only going to increase.

With the growing level of interest in all things mobile already, not to mention the number and variety of devices, there will be plenty of room in the market for both mobile websites and platform-specific apps to flourish. But for those out there publishing lists of &quot;iPhone apps&quot;, please, let&#039;s just call them what they really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Paul, and thanks for contributing. As Salvador also implies, just because being an &#8216;iPhone app&#8217; is trendy, does not make it so. It&#8217;s true that mobile developers can include the large majority of the functionality we see today simply through a mobile website that is available on virtually any mobile browser.</p>
<p>Some handset makers (Apple) and mobile platform providers (Google&#8217;s Android) though have pushed the envelope in adding newer functionality that uses information from the device OS itself. The perfect example is the accelerometer, which is available for both iPhone and Android application developers. These &#8216;hard-wired&#8217; features not available to web developers are only going to increase.</p>
<p>With the growing level of interest in all things mobile already, not to mention the number and variety of devices, there will be plenty of room in the market for both mobile websites and platform-specific apps to flourish. But for those out there publishing lists of &#8220;iPhone apps&#8221;, please, let&#8217;s just call them what they really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Nerger</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Nerger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Your observation about web sites versus a local app is spot on.  The same is not only true for the iPhone but also Blackberry and Symbian.  Handset manufacturers and network operators would like developers to only develop for their handset or their network but this conflicts with the developer&#039;s goal of getting everything deployed everywhere.

Although it has taken nearly ten years, we do have an HTTP protocol and markup language that works on nearly every phone on the planet.  Yes, phones have different screen sizes, color depth, &quot;click-to-call&quot; links, and other key factors, but they mostly speak the same language.  Further, you can pair the web site with a technology like DeviceAtlas (www.deviceatlas.com) which will detect the phone make and model for you to allow you to dynamically adapt your site to the specific nears and aspirations of every browser (including the PC ones).

So if you want to easily build applications that work on all devices, look no further than the mobile web.  It&#039;s quick, it&#039;s easy, and it works.

Paul Nerger
VP Advanced Services
dotMobi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your observation about web sites versus a local app is spot on.  The same is not only true for the iPhone but also Blackberry and Symbian.  Handset manufacturers and network operators would like developers to only develop for their handset or their network but this conflicts with the developer&#8217;s goal of getting everything deployed everywhere.</p>
<p>Although it has taken nearly ten years, we do have an HTTP protocol and markup language that works on nearly every phone on the planet.  Yes, phones have different screen sizes, color depth, &#8220;click-to-call&#8221; links, and other key factors, but they mostly speak the same language.  Further, you can pair the web site with a technology like DeviceAtlas (www.deviceatlas.com) which will detect the phone make and model for you to allow you to dynamically adapt your site to the specific nears and aspirations of every browser (including the PC ones).</p>
<p>So if you want to easily build applications that work on all devices, look no further than the mobile web.  It&#8217;s quick, it&#8217;s easy, and it works.</p>
<p>Paul Nerger<br />
VP Advanced Services<br />
dotMobi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salvador</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Salvador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-638</guid>
		<description>It seems that if is not application, it does not exist ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that if is not application, it does not exist ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileFreak</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Link is fixed - our apologies pixites and all. Thanks for catching that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link is fixed &#8211; our apologies pixites and all. Thanks for catching that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixites</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/mobile-website-or-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>pixites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/?p=462#comment-636</guid>
		<description>link does not work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>link does not work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

