<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why YouTube + Verizon = AOL circa 1995</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/why-youtube-verizon-aol-circa-1995/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/why-youtube-verizon-aol-circa-1995</link>
	<description>Mobile websites, applications, and tools for the mobile phone, PDA, and other wireless devices.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Gives Mobile Video a Boost</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemammoth.com/mobile-websites/why-youtube-verizon-aol-circa-1995#comment-7526</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Gives Mobile Video a Boost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemammoth.com/why-youtube-verizon-aol-circa-1995#comment-7526</guid>
		<description>[...] The gents at YouTube (or now Google) must have read our earlier post on why the YouTube on Verizon deal was a joke. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The gents at YouTube (or now Google) must have read our earlier post on why the YouTube on Verizon deal was a joke. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.116 seconds -->
